Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    46

    Re: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

    Rick:

    Have you been happy with the DLC you've used? Also which plater(s) have you used for this?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Upstate of South Carolina
    Posts
    701

    Re: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

    Nikom,
    We have looked at it for SEVERAL molds. But to convince a company to try something new is ALWAYS a stretch. There’s a place in NC reasonably close to us that we want to use. Our thoughts were to do lifters and like ejector pins with slots for ribs cut in them. They used to be Sulzer but I think the parent company made a push to adopt their name.
    They brought in plated guide pins and round bushings for a mold. Ridiculous how slick they are w/o lube on them. I’ve seen molds Dynablued for glass wear resistance but hard to repair some damage. With DLC I think they can remove, repair and plate again.
    Rick

  3. #3

    Re: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

    My biggest sturggle has been making the parts without voids in the middle... I'm tried everything. The mold is 350 degrees, the material is at 735 degrees. Slow speed, high speed, low BP - high BP, High pressure, low pressure, short cool times, extended cool times....

    I'm near the point of just saying that I don't think we can mold a part that's as thick as this is without the voids...

    Any last suggestions?

    Currently the part is filling through a runner in the middle of the "L" shape... I'm contemplating having dual fill spots? Near the top and bottom? Or will that do nothing?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    46

    Re: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

    What is the thickness of the part? What size and shape are the gates and runners/sprue?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Capture.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	7.7 KB 
ID:	401

    I'm hoping that only one of the 0.625 dimensions in this sketch is correct and your part has a much thinner wall.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    181

    Re: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

    I used to mold a PEEK plaque that was around 2.5” x 2.5” x .375”. Mold temp 400 F and – most importantly – the cavity was sprue gated. Cooling time was very long – 60 or 90 seconds. Hold pressure just low enough to not blow the mold open. But as Nikom says, I wouldn’t have much hope of making a good part with a .625” wall section.

    As for Ultem, if you’re going to machine the parts so appearance isn’t an issue: if you run the melt and mold very hot so the part cools very slowly, you just might be able to trade voids for sink.

  6. #6

    Re: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

    Thanks Jay, yeah these are very thick parts. It makes sense why no company would give them a bid for doing it. Good for me, I have a great job. Bad for me, mission impossible. I'm going to try to add more heat to the mold and open the runner to the normal call out of 75% and spure gate the cavities. Hopefully that helps.

    Thanks for the insight all. Will post if I'm successful in my efforts.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Upstate of South Carolina
    Posts
    701

    Re: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

    How are you heating the tool? Can you get it hotter? Perhaps the runner is freezing too soon hence the sinks or voids. Can you injection compression the parts? Maybe that would work.
    Rick

  8. #8

    Re: Ultem and CF Peek in an aluminum mold

    Unfortunately that is the exact shape and size of the part, only that there are two cavities in the mold. One facing up, the other upside down. Nearly in the shape of a square.

    As for the runner and sprue - sprue starts at .275 and opens / tapers to the runner at .400

    The runner is circular - undersized at .370 (I say undersized because typical runners are 75% of the part wall thickness - usually)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •